Candidate for Teacher Education Program First Last Major Evaluator Name First Last Evaluator's Email* Semester/Year School Grade Level/Subject Directions:Please check all indicators listed under each disposition that have been observed. Then rate the candidate on the disposition, as a whole, by selecting the appropriate number in the cell using the following scale. Comments are required on level 1 and 2 ratings, and welcomed on level 3 and 4 ratings. 1. Unacceptable/refer to the Teacher Education Committee 2. Needs remediation conference with professor 3. Acceptable (expected of preservice teachers) 4. Exemplary (beyond the expected level) If you are rating an online learner, not all indicators will apply. Please mark the categories most appropriate for the online learning environment.Demonstrates Professionalism Exhibits regular punctuality and attendance Listens while others are speaking Turns in assignments on time Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Demonstrates a Positive and Enthusiastic Attitude Is intrinsically motivated to succeed Initiates interaction when appropriate Does not whine or excessively complain Takes pride in his/her work Does not display signs of boredom Shows interest in class discussions/issues Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Demonstrates Effective Oral Communication Skills Presents effectively in front of class Dresses professionally for presentations Uses Standard English Has good tone and pitch Shows leadership in group work Uses a broad vocabulary Can switch to academic register Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Demonstrates Effective Written Communication Skills Correctly uses grammatical conventions, including spelling Shows evidence of proofreading work Employs both formal and informal writing styles Adheres to assignment guidelines Communicates appropriately via teacher's preferred method (email, text, phone, etc.) Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Exhibits an Appreciation and Value for Diversity Does not use racial stereotypes Interacts in a friendly manner with the majority of peers Demonstrates sensitivity to all diversities/differences Remains open to differing persons and opinions Does not demean others Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Is Prepared to Teach and Learn Participates actively Asks and answers questions demonstrating authentic interest Comes to class prepared and with needed materials Demonstrates maturity in learning exchange Appears to be striving to do his/her best Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Collaborates Effectively Negotiates respectfully, showing sensitivity to the feelings of others Engages in friendly dialogue Demonstrates a positive reaction to group work Helps facilitate less motivated or struggling group members Respects hierarchy between faculty and students Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Is a Self-regulated Learner and Takes Initiative Takes initiative to find solutions and solve problems Does not make excuses or blame others Appears to be intrinsically motivated Takes the time to understand concepts Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Exhibits the Emotional Intelligence to Achieve Personal Goals Demonstrates appropriate maturity and self-regulation Does not distract from learning with personal problems/storytelling Does not overreact to criticism Manages high-demand tasks well Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Reflects on Teaching and Learning Tries to improve Identifies areas for growth Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Exhibits Respect for Peers and Professors Addresses people appropriately Keeps appointments Does not use electronic devices inappropriately in/during class Respectfully disagrees and constructively criticizes with logic and calmness Rating 1 - Unacceptable 2 - Needs Remediation 3 - Acceptable 4 - Exemplary Not Applicable Comments regarding strengths/areas for growth:Final ThoughtsFrom my observation of this person, it is my opinion that he/she should continue in teacher education.* Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Recommended Letter Grade Rationale